For today's second socratic circle we will be breaking into two groups: the first will be our "fishbowl," leading a group discussion about Mary Shelley's Frankenstein

After twenty minutes, we will switch roles, and group 2 will have their own discussion on an important article on these same readings, while group 1 live comments (see instructions below).

Instructions: 
Audience members: in the comments section of this post, make thoughtful observations about the conversation taking place in the "fishbowl."  Good observations will do the following:
  1. Identify when you agree/disagree with observations and specifically state why (ASRApt Specific Reference).  
  2. Observe what specific group members did that helped to 
    1. "propel" conversation forward, 
    2. respond to their group members, 
    3. and provide thoughtful observations.

Fishbowl members: students who do well in the "fishbowl" will do the following:

  1. Come to discussion prepared, having read and researched materials beforehand.
  2. Work with peers to promote a civil, democratic discussion, set clear goals, and establish individual roles. 
  3. Propel conversations forward by posing and asking questions that probe reasoning and ask for evidence. 
  4. Respond thoughtful to diverse perspectives, synthesize (combine) comments, claims, and evidence, resolve contradictions, and investigate meaning. 

Comments

  1. James immediately startes up the conversation then Maddison moved the conversation along by asking a few questions and others answering them.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I find it interesting how James brings in Walton's emotions as a new channel to move the conversation forward.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Emerson: James starts a topic; and Madison starts a question. Christian answers the question and starts a discussion, and I like his idea that the man he saw before was Frankenstein's monster. Madison brings up the dog! Where did the dog go! I don't know! I was looking for that earlier.

    ReplyDelete
  4. christian comes up with a theory that the man pulled off the ice berg is doctor frankenstien.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Morgan asks a question that propels the discussion forward

    ReplyDelete
  6. They talk about theorys that involve characters that we will learn about later

    ReplyDelete
  7. I personally don't like how the conversation moved to the potential that Frankenstein or his monster is the one on the sled since it begins a blank conversation that really doesn't do much.

    ReplyDelete
  8. James feels that enough had been said on a certain subject, so he changes the subject and brings up another topic and then asks Zach if he has anything to say on the new subject

    ReplyDelete
  9. Emerson: I really like the idea that the person seen before was Frankenstein's monster. I also have my own ideas about it. James instigates a shift in topic.

    ReplyDelete
  10. James brings up multiple good points about the dates of the letters, which helps propel the conversation

    ReplyDelete
  11. Madison asks a question regarding why there had been no messages sent back to Robert and James responds with a response that seems logical

    ReplyDelete
  12. Starts off with a relation to personal experience

    ReplyDelete
  13. Sadie starts the converstion of strong with a personal refrence

    ReplyDelete
  14. Jordan brings up a good point by discussing the gender roles, making connections to other points discussed in class.

    ReplyDelete
  15. I think it is interesting what Maddy said about how his sister knows (or should know) about his past

    ReplyDelete
  16. There weren't as many gaps in the conversation (for group 2)

    ReplyDelete
  17. Group 2 brought up things from the first section of reading which expanded the conversation a lot.

    ReplyDelete
  18. The group analyses the story that Walton tells his sister. This was a bit off topic.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Andy did a nice job analyzing the text.

    ReplyDelete
  20. I like that Sadie makes sure that she and the rest of the group understand what is being said

    ReplyDelete
  21. Sadie starts the conversation. It shifts to gender. They discuss how it appears that the main character allowed a woman to walk over him. Andy brings up how the man is in a very dangerous environment, and is just hiding his fear and emotions.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Andy refrences the book to talk about a new point and starts off a great converstion

    ReplyDelete
  23. Andy drives the discussion in a new direction by discussing Walton's true emotions compared to what he admits to.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Brooke had a nice observation of possible foreshadowing.

    ReplyDelete
  25. Brooke talks about the stranger and how important he is to R.W

    ReplyDelete
  26. I like the analysis of quotes coming out because it seems much more effective than theories

    ReplyDelete
  27. Ryan bringing up the phrase from the text "If you ever hear from me again" helps to get the rest of their circle to discuss what they thought about that topic of the book.

    ReplyDelete
  28. They discuss the stranger's mental state.

    ReplyDelete
  29. I don't like how one group member told another group member that they should not talk about an idea

    ReplyDelete
  30. I like that they are referencing a top8c from another group's idea although it is being moved away from

    ReplyDelete
  31. Emerson adds to the conversation about the main character's fear by mentioning the tone of his letters.
    The topic of the stranger's importance is brought up. The stranger's behaviour is mentioned.

    ReplyDelete
  32. I don't like how Jordan (I'm sorry if I spelled that wrong) kept on mediately turning the conversation away from things that group 1 had already discussed. They could've had an original conversation, but no one will ever know because they were getting cut off.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular Posts