Frankenstein. Chap. 20: Socratic Circle


Yesterday, we had two excellent socratic circles at the end of our discussion, but we didn't seem to have enough time to dig deeper into William Wordsworth's "Tintern Abbey" and Mary Shelley's Frankenstein. For today, let's pick up where we left off. Further speaking and listening instructions are below.

Instructions: 
Audience members: in the comments section of this post, make thoughtful observations about the conversation taking place in the "fishbowl."  Good observations will do the following:
  1. Identify when you agree/disagree with observations and specifically state why (ASRApt Specific Reference).  
  2. Observe what specific group members did that helped to 
    1. "propel" conversation forward, 
    2. respond to their group members, 
    3. and provide thoughtful observations.

Fishbowl members: students who do well in the "fishbowl" will do the following:

  1. Come to discussion prepared, having read and researched materials beforehand.
  2. Work with peers to promote a civil, democratic discussion, set clear goals, and establish individual roles. 
  3. Propel conversations forward by posing and asking questions that probe reasoning and ask for evidence. 
  4. Respond thoughtful to diverse perspectives, synthesize (combine) comments, claims, and evidence, resolve contradictions, and investigate meaning. 

Comments

  1. The conversation started immediately

    ReplyDelete
  2. A question was used to start the conversation.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I like James starting with a good question that starts the conversation in a good place and gets the ball rolling

    ReplyDelete
  4. I don't really like how speculative the discussion is right off the bat about whether Frankenstein would have destroyed the monster, since there are many more literal things to discuss about such as aspects of romanticism present, or even just summarizing the chapter as a whole.

    ReplyDelete
  5. James raises a question as to whether or not the monster's appearance was the driving factor in the destruction of the monster's mate.

    ReplyDelete
  6. People have nice ideas on what may happen next. Well rounded convo, most everyone is talking very frequently

    ReplyDelete
  7. The conversation has only been going on for three minutes and everybody has talked

    ReplyDelete
  8. Andy raises the point that the story requires Frankenstein's refusal.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Informal in a good way. Andy brings the scope of the conversationinto the whole book and not just chapter20

    ReplyDelete
  10. I appreciate the modern scientific view, but I also like how Sadie brings in the notion that science wasn't understood the same when the book was published, so Frankenstein would not have all the same information. I would have continued discussing this if I had the chance.

    ReplyDelete
  11. discussing foreshadowing of clerval’s death (?)

    ReplyDelete
  12. Nice discussion of foreshadowing and nice response to literary analysis

    ReplyDelete
  13. I really like how Brooke compares Clerval to the positive emotions in Frankestein.

    ReplyDelete
  14. I think the conversation gets just a little too casual.

    ReplyDelete
  15. The time debate has begun again and the circle descends into chaos.

    ReplyDelete
  16. I feel as though Ryan is being too informal. I do agree that there should be a balance between formality and informality, but he frequently derails the conversation by making jokes that other people then have to remedy.

    ReplyDelete
  17. The conversation is light and entertaining while still maintaining a solid, related theme

    ReplyDelete
  18. Speculation is rampant- this circle has lost its focus.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Nice job making sure people get to talk when they try too

    ReplyDelete
  20. I like how Sadie made sure that Andy could talk.

    ReplyDelete
  21. All y'all overachievers with your 'reading ahead'

    ReplyDelete
  22. Even when seemingly exhausted on stuff to talk about in the chapter they are able to continue

    ReplyDelete
  23. Transition to the article is a much-needed change of pace.

    ReplyDelete
  24. There was a period of time in which many people were talking all at once, and it really didn't get resolved for a while. These talking sections happen occasionally and don't help much.

    ReplyDelete
  25. I like how Brooke ties in the article about modern science.

    ReplyDelete
  26. Jordan mentions a good discussion strategy to start out.

    ReplyDelete
  27. Jordan immediately starts the conversation by talking about what the other group talked about.

    ReplyDelete
  28. grace says how frankenstein is building up a lot of emotions inside him.

    ReplyDelete
  29. Already some great points, very philosophical

    ReplyDelete
  30. I like how people talk casually during the conversation.

    ReplyDelete
  31. Everyone has talked at least once and the conversation has continued consistently

    ReplyDelete
  32. Everybody’s having a same proportion of conversation, which means this conversation goes well and everyone has a chance to talk.

    ReplyDelete
  33. Morgan brings up a good question: was his reaction to the monster justified?

    ReplyDelete
  34. Morgan raises a good question about Victor's reaction that should lead to a lot of good discussion.

    ReplyDelete
  35. jordan leads the group towards talking about the article

    ReplyDelete
  36. The group seems to be running out of ideas for discussion.

    ReplyDelete
  37. It was a good conversation with pretty equal participation

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular Posts