Frankenstein. Chap. 20: Socratic Circle
Yesterday, we had two excellent socratic circles at the end of our discussion, but we didn't seem to have enough time to dig deeper into William Wordsworth's "Tintern Abbey" and Mary Shelley's Frankenstein. For today, let's pick up where we left off. Further speaking and listening instructions are below.
Instructions:
Audience members: in the comments section of this post, make thoughtful observations about the conversation taking place in the "fishbowl." Good observations will do the following:
- Identify when you agree/disagree with observations and specifically state why (ASR: Apt Specific Reference).
- Observe what specific group members did that helped to
- "propel" conversation forward,
- respond to their group members,
- and provide thoughtful observations.
Fishbowl members: students who do well in the "fishbowl" will do the following:
- Come to discussion prepared, having read and researched materials beforehand.
- Work with peers to promote a civil, democratic discussion, set clear goals, and establish individual roles.
- Propel conversations forward by posing and asking questions that probe reasoning and ask for evidence.
- Respond thoughtful to diverse perspectives, synthesize (combine) comments, claims, and evidence, resolve contradictions, and investigate meaning.
The conversation started immediately
ReplyDeleteA question was used to start the conversation.
ReplyDeleteI like James starting with a good question that starts the conversation in a good place and gets the ball rolling
ReplyDeleteI don't really like how speculative the discussion is right off the bat about whether Frankenstein would have destroyed the monster, since there are many more literal things to discuss about such as aspects of romanticism present, or even just summarizing the chapter as a whole.
ReplyDeleteJames raises a question as to whether or not the monster's appearance was the driving factor in the destruction of the monster's mate.
ReplyDeletePeople have nice ideas on what may happen next. Well rounded convo, most everyone is talking very frequently
ReplyDeleteThe conversation has only been going on for three minutes and everybody has talked
ReplyDeleteAndy raises the point that the story requires Frankenstein's refusal.
ReplyDeleteInformal in a good way. Andy brings the scope of the conversationinto the whole book and not just chapter20
ReplyDeleteI appreciate the modern scientific view, but I also like how Sadie brings in the notion that science wasn't understood the same when the book was published, so Frankenstein would not have all the same information. I would have continued discussing this if I had the chance.
ReplyDeletediscussing foreshadowing of clerval’s death (?)
ReplyDeleteNice discussion of foreshadowing and nice response to literary analysis
ReplyDeleteI really like how Brooke compares Clerval to the positive emotions in Frankestein.
ReplyDeleteI think the conversation gets just a little too casual.
ReplyDeleteThe time debate has begun again and the circle descends into chaos.
ReplyDeleteI feel as though Ryan is being too informal. I do agree that there should be a balance between formality and informality, but he frequently derails the conversation by making jokes that other people then have to remedy.
ReplyDeleteThe conversation is light and entertaining while still maintaining a solid, related theme
ReplyDeleteSpeculation is rampant- this circle has lost its focus.
ReplyDeleteNice job making sure people get to talk when they try too
ReplyDeleteI like how Sadie made sure that Andy could talk.
ReplyDeleteAll y'all overachievers with your 'reading ahead'
ReplyDeleteEven when seemingly exhausted on stuff to talk about in the chapter they are able to continue
ReplyDeleteTransition to the article is a much-needed change of pace.
ReplyDeleteThere was a period of time in which many people were talking all at once, and it really didn't get resolved for a while. These talking sections happen occasionally and don't help much.
ReplyDeleteI like how Brooke ties in the article about modern science.
ReplyDeleteJordan mentions a good discussion strategy to start out.
ReplyDeleteJordan immediately starts the conversation by talking about what the other group talked about.
ReplyDeletegrace says how frankenstein is building up a lot of emotions inside him.
ReplyDeleteAlready some great points, very philosophical
ReplyDeleteI like how people talk casually during the conversation.
ReplyDeleteEveryone has talked at least once and the conversation has continued consistently
ReplyDeleteEverybody’s having a same proportion of conversation, which means this conversation goes well and everyone has a chance to talk.
ReplyDeleteMorgan brings up a good question: was his reaction to the monster justified?
ReplyDeleteMorgan raises a good question about Victor's reaction that should lead to a lot of good discussion.
ReplyDeletejordan leads the group towards talking about the article
ReplyDeleteThe group seems to be running out of ideas for discussion.
ReplyDeletegood job including everyone
ReplyDeleteIt was a good conversation with pretty equal participation
ReplyDelete