Serial Podcast Episode 11: Rumors by Shea and Sophie



Episode 11

Episode 11 of the Serial Podcast focuses mainly on two things: the rumors surrounding Adnan, and the psychology behind murderers. To start the episode, Sarah Koenig explains that since the release of the first episode of the podcast, she has received a plethora of information through phone calls, texts, and emails. The problem with this information, however, is that they are all what Koenig would classify as rumors. Information from one person often fails to align with information from another person, and Koenig has difficulty understanding what, if any, truth can be discerned from all these conflicting reports. According to Koenig, all of these rumors come from Muslims in the community who often attended the same mosque as Adnan. She lets the viewers know that she investigates almost every rumor as best she can, but more often than not, they are so insignificant that there is nothing to investigate.

The most important rumor of the episode is that supposedly Adnan stole money from his mosque. Two separate mosque-attenders tell Koenig that Adnan "skimmed" donation money but only one of these informants goes on tape with Koenig. An anonymous male alleges that he witnessed Adnan, the "good little Muslim kid," steal thousands of dollars every week. Additionally, the anonymous man admits to stealing money himself, suggesting that this was not a rare occurrence in the Muslim community. Koenig talks to the president of the Islamic Society of Baltimore, who explains that theft was not uncommon, but that, realistically, Adnan only could have stolen at most twenty to forty dollars a week.

After being presented with this information, Koenig goes to Adnan and asks him if it was true; if he had in fact stolen donation money. Adnan is insulted and irritated with Koenig questioning him about it, but perhaps more importantly, he admits that it was true. Adnan thinks that it was an unfair and accusatory question, especially since he was ashamed of stealing in the first place. Adnan reveals that he and the other 8th grade children who were collecting donations would steal around $60, then spend it on movies or the arcade. Only after being caught by his mother did Adnan stop, and it was later in life that he realized how wrong it was to steal. Various members of the mosque think that it was a shameful deed, but not one that made Adnan a bad person (and much less a murderer).

Koenig talks to Atif Iqbal, a fellow mosque-goer who knew Adnan. Atif says that he had never seen Adnan mad. However, the same anonymous man who said that Adnan stole money claims that "whatever was coming out of his mouth half of the time . . . was just sweet talk or . . . a lie." On the other side of the coin, that same man says that Adnan was a great guy who was friendly and smart.

Koenig goes on to talk with Charles Ewing, a forensic psychologist who evaluates criminal defendants. She talks with him to figure out what might have been going on in Adnan's mind were he the killer. Based off of what she's heard from those who knew him, Koenig needs to figure out if the character that she knows is capable of murder. Ewing explains that more often than not, people commit murder when they are pushed over the edge, not because of psychopathic tendencies. It appears that if Adnan killed Hae, it would be unlikely that it was premeditated.

A former classmate and a former teacher of his both agreed: Adnan didn't have it in him to premeditate a murder. They postulate that it was a murder in the heat of the moment; a murder of passion and emotion where Adnan just snapped. Ewing confirms that people can "snap," and that he does not consider it premeditation, even if the killer had previously mulled over the idea of killing someone.

Another idea Koenig has is that it's possible that Adnan simply doesn't believe he murdered Hae. Ewing once again confirms that this is a possibility explaining that in over half of the people he's evaluated, there was some degree of amnesia involved. Ewing explains that it is possible that Adnan committed murder in a completely dissociative state.

The final theory is that Adnan is a psychopath. Ewing explains that psychopaths are rarely killers, and killers are rarely psychopaths. Were Adnan a psychopath, he would have superficial charm and be highly manipulative. The fact that Adnan has been successful in prison and maintains friendships makes the theory less attractive, but not impossible. Ewing concludes that from what he knows about Adnan, he doesn't believe he is a psychopath, because he believes that he can show real empathy.

Finally, Koenig discusses the fact that Adnan has been relatively calm throughout all these years. Some people point to his apparent lack of frustration and anger as evidence that he is guilty. Adnan explains that displaying these emotions vividly and outwardly will produce nothing. He believes that no matter what he says or does, people won't be able to understand how he feels. He also explains that he carefully thinks about what he says or does, out of fear of being accused of lying or manipulating.

Discussion Questions:

1. Do you see similarities between Koenig’s and Capote’s investigations? Explain.

2. If Adnan did murder Hae, how do you think it happened: was it premeditated or did he snap?

3. Why do you think there are so many conflicting reports on Adnan’s character? From what you’ve heard, do you think Adnan is who he presents himself as?

4. What do you think about the fact that Adnan stole from the mosque? Does it change your image of him?

Comments

  1. 1. I see some similarities here. First, there is a relationship between the authors, Koenig and Capote, and the convicted criminals, Adnan and Perry. The relationship seems to be very friendly, and leads to the author getting a lot of information that they need from the convicted criminals. While I think that Capote takes advantage of Perry more, I still think this is a similarity. Secondly, both cases involve murder, and in both cases, the author is trying to figure out what happened to the victims.
    2. I think that if Adnan did kill Hae, then it was premeditated. If he actually did kill her, then I believe Jay's general story to be true, and I think that Adnan killing her probably was something he planned. This would explain why he lent Jay his cell phone and car, and it would explain the Nisha call. However, I do not think Adnan is a psychopath.
    3. A possible reason for conflicting reports would be that people previously saw him as a good person, but once they heard that he was linked to a murder, some people began to make connections between him and bad things he had done. People who believe he is guilty will find the negative qualities in him, while those who think he is innocent will find the good characteristics. From my perspective, I think that Adnan is who he presents himself as. I think he is genuine and I believe the things he says because he sounds sincere.
    4. I think that Adnan stealing the money does not say much about his character because people change a lot from their junior high years to their high school years. I know that I am not the same person that I was in eighth grade, and I do not think that it is possible to make any true conclusions about Adnan based off of a mistake in eighth grade. Although stealing is bad and it does show that he previously might not have held himself to high moral codes, this does not mean that he did not learn from his mistakes and he did not change.

    ReplyDelete
  2. 1. I do see some similarities between Koenig’s investigation and Capote’s. They both interviewed supposed criminals as well as interviewing many people who were close to the criminals as well as the victim. They also went into depth about the crime itself by investigating evidence. However, Capote definitely knew that the crime had been committed by the people that he interviewed while Koenig tried to prove whether or not Adnan was guilty.

    2. If Adnan murdered Hae, I do not believe that it would be premeditated, because i don’t think that Adnan has personality necessary to commit premeditated murder. Additionally, if he murdered her, the nature of the crime would have been full of emotion, because he was motivated out of jealously. The emotional nature of the crime seems to me would mean that he would have acted on impulse rather than plan the crime.

    3. There are probably the differing views on Adnan, because different people see different aspects of him. For example, people who met him at the mosque would have a different view from people who met him smoking weed. Everyone only sees a snippet of who Adnan is, so nobody has the whole picture. However, I think that for the most part I think that Adnan presents himself as a nice, friendly guy.

    4. I think that Adnan stealing from the mosque was simply the actions a dumb eighth grader who did not realize the effect that his actions had. It did not change my perception of him, because all people do stupid thing as eighth graders, and he is no better or worse than anyone else.

    ReplyDelete
  3. 1) The most prominent similarity that I can see is that she seems to have a soft spot for Adnan, just like Capote did for Perry. She is most definitely biased towards him. Also, they were both trying to figure out if the "killers" were really guilty.

    2) If Adnan is guilty of murdering Hae I think he would have snapped. He is always calm and has not been shown as being generally aggressive or angry. Even in prison he is calm and has good behavior. This leads my to believe that he just snapped.

    3) I think that some people who claim to have known him and commented on his personality probably are not as close to him as they say, or they are smoking buddies who were too stoned to really remember what he was like when they hung out.

    4) I think that dumb 8th graders will be dumbe 8th graders. The stealing does not make him a killer, it makes him a teenager who wanted to go to the arcade. My view of him has not changed.

    ReplyDelete
  4. 1. Do you see similarities between Koenig’s and Capote’s investigations? Explain.
    I think there are many similarities as well as differences. Both cases involve the creators seeking a level of understanding and wanting to share them with the world, however Capote's seems to take on a much more personal touch. In Serial the whole case is open for the audience and the only thing left a mystery is "who done it?" while Capote's all about how.
    2. If Adnan did murder Hae, how do you think it happened: was it premeditated or did he snap?
    I think if Adnan truly did kill Hae it was because he snapped. She did or said something that just made him lose all self control and his only thoughts where of violence and he killed her. However I think it is also quite possible that she did or knew something that led him to want to get rid of her. By the little amount of evidence there is I feel it might have been harder to cover up a murder that sporadically happened in a Best Buy parking lot.
    3. Why do you think there are so many conflicting reports on Adnan’s character? From what you’ve heard, do you think Adnan is who he presents himself as?
    I think Adnan is very careful and intentional in how he presents himself. With that many conflicting reports I am sure he had both good and bad characterisitcs, but in the end I don't really see him as a murderer or a psycopath.
    4. What do you think about the fact that Adnan stole from the mosque? Does it change your image of him?
    I think everyone makes mistakes, and gives in to urges. What really shows character is how they respond and change. Adnan appears to feel guilty and to have learned and moved on from that experience. I do not think a single incident such as that defines a person and whether they are a murderer.

    ReplyDelete
  5. 1) While there are similarities between the case of In Cold Blood and Adnan's trial, there are more differences to make the comparison. The cases are both so different, the people being different, and the bond between convict and journalist, the two cases repel.
    2) If Adnan did murder Hae that I believe it would have been a snap judgement. Even in Jays stories there is an air of uneasiness and rattled to Adnan that points me away from believing that it was preemptive.
    3) I think that everyone has different sides of themselves that they show to different people. The person you are around your family is usually a different person than who you are around friends who is usually a different person than who you act around strangers. Due to this, it is not un expected that there are different accounts of his character and taking one more seriously than the other would be foolish.
    4) On one hand I want to believe that he was young and stupid and didn't care about his actions. We all make mistakes right? But on the other hand I also believe that character is who you are when no one is watching and your character, even though it changes over time, is fundamental even in 8th grade. So stealing from the mosque places doubt in me, but keep in mind that this is a completely different subject from its relativity to the case.

    ReplyDelete
  6. 1. Do you see similarities between Koenig’s and Capote’s investigations? Explain.
    I do see some similarities between Koenig’s and Capote’s investigations. The most noticeable is the relationship between journalist and prisoner. In both cases, a strong bond was formed between the parties and a lot of information was revealed. Similarly, both prisoners withheld their information for quite some time before telling the truth.

    2. If Adnan did murder Hae, how do you think it happened: was it premeditated or did he snap?
    If Adnan did murder Hae and I had to use the court definition of premeditated murder, then he would have premeditated the murder. After a break up, people’s minds can go darker than usual and the thought of murder might have flashed through his mind at some point. The day of the murder, Adnan and Hae might have been hanging out and Hae was talking about her new boyfriend and Adnan just snapped and killed her.

    3. Why do you think there are so many conflicting reports on Adnan’s character? From what you’ve heard, do you think Adnan is who he presents himself as?
    There are always multiple sides to a person. Of course there are going to be some people that question a person’s character because no one is perfect towards everyone. He may act a different way with his friends at school then the adults at the mosque. Overall, I believe Adnan presents himself as a kind and good man.

    4. What do you think about the fact that Adnan stole from the mosque? Does it change your image of him?
    I think that Adnan was acting like an eighth grader. Children make mistakes and learn from them. I actually think this image makes him better. If anyone act perfect with no other quality, I never believe it because that is simply false. Adnan until now reminded me of the Clutter family and I am so glad Koenig showed a different side of him. Everyone is rebellious or negative in someway, and if they don't seem it, then they are hiding it really well. A different side of Adnan was shown and that, in my mind, creates a relatable character.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I see some similarities. Both investigations are deeply rooted in the connection between the journalist and the convict. This relationship varies between the cases with Capote manipulating his convicts in an attempt to discover how a family was murdered from death row inmates and Koenig is trying to help Adnan by discovering the truth of what happened to Hae.

    2. If Adnan did murder Hae, I don't think he planned out the kill. I think that he was angry at the fact that the girl he had risked so much for had tossed him aside, and that was driving him up a wall. I think he might have seen her that day and something set him off, maybe something Hae said, and he snapped and killed her.

    3. I think that it is so hard for us to grasp a complete picture of Adnan because we have never met him. People are complex and all that we have been given on him is some stories, some audio files of the man he became after years in jail, and the perspective of a journalist that interviewed that man. We don't have a complete picture of him as a person, no one does, all anyone has is the knowledge of how he acted around them and people can act very differently in different circumstances.

    4. My opinion of Adnan remains constant. He always seemed to me like a decent guy that was caught up in something that he shouldn't have been involved in. That sums up my opinion of him. He shouldn't have dated Hae, he shouldn't of stolen form the mosque and he shouldn't have murdered Hae/ been involved in the case. Adnan stealing from the mosque just adds more to this picture of him doing something he shouldn't have, even if he isn't the best person.

    ReplyDelete
  8. 1. Do you see similarities between Koenig’s and Capote’s investigations? Explain.

    I see some vague similarities between Koenig's and Capote's investigations, because they are essentially the same type. They are both investigative journalism. In both cases, the investigator is interviewing the convicted criminal(s). They are also similar on a personal level, with both Capote and Koenig taking a liking to Perry and Adnan, respectively.

    2. If Adnan did murder Hae, how do you think it happened: was it premeditated or did he snap?

    I don't think that Adnan murdered Hae. However, if he really did, i believe that he most likely snapped. Adnan doesn't seem to be the type of person to plan out the murder of someone close to him.

    3. Why do you think there are so many conflicting reports on Adnan’s character? From what you’ve heard, do you think Adnan is who he presents himself as?

    I think that adnan is who he presents himself as. I think that there may be conflicting reports on his character due who he hangs out with. Whenever someone joins a group, they tend to act accordingly to how that group or person operates. The more laid back the group or person, the more laid back you are. The more mischievous the group, The more mischievous you will become, to a certain extent. That's why I said that I believe he is who he presents himself as. Because when talking in a laid back conversation, he is acting like how a laid back person would.

    4. What do you think about the fact that Adnan stole from the mosque? Does it change your image of him?

    I don't think that it's right for anyone to steal. That being said, he did it over ten years ago, when he was in 8th grade. I don't think that action defines him as a person, so him stealing from his mosque does not change my image of him. That image is that he is innately a good person.

    ReplyDelete
  9. 1. While I do see similarities such as the comparison of the relationship between journalist and inmate that was brought up during our discussion, I feel that the contexts between the two were simply too great to draw a firm connection. Capote was in an entirely different era, interviewing two men who he knew had committed the murder and were on death row. Compared to how Adnan and Koenig are interacting, I don't see more than a surface level comparison.
    2. If Adnan did indeed murder Hae, then it was almost definitely premeditated. There is nothing that sticks out about either his or Hae's day that would cause him to snap, and at no point did he interact with Hae other than in passing. In order for him to successfully murder Hae and get away with it, he would have had to think upon how he would do it beforehand.
    3. I think there are many conflicting reports simply because that's the way things are. If you don't like someone, you are not going to go out of your way to be extraordinarily kind to them, and the opposite is true. Adnan had so many conflicting reports because he interacted with every person differently, and they all wanted to give their opinions about the case. I do believe that he was being himself in all of these cases, it's just that his mood and demeanor very from case to case.
    4. I think that while it is wrong to steal, and that could be held against his character in court, it is not definite enough or significant enough to change any intelligent persons opinion.

    ReplyDelete
  10. 1. Yes, I do see the similarities between the relationships of the journalists and the convicted. Both journalists face the challenge of remaining unbiased when addressing their main interviewee(s), and both forms of media fall within the true crime genre. However, I don't feel like the cases are similar enough to draw any other conclusions/similarities.

    2. I think that if Adnan killed Hae, it was more likely a spontaneous decision rather than a planned one. Adnan shows several characteristics that directly contradict the symptoms of the standard psychopath, including empathy (genuine guilt for some of his less-honorable actions) and the ability to make friends (a strong social life, both in and out of prison).

    3. Everyone has different sides of themselves that they expose in certain situations. There were certainly people that Adnan didn't like all that much, and consequently wasn't all that friendly to... I think this concept actually reinforces the fact that Adnan is sane. He isn't manipulating others into thinking he's perfect; he isn't, and he lets it show. I believe that Adnan is a kind-hearted person and is remarkably intelligent and mindful (especially considering the situation).

    4. Yes, stealing from the mosque was wrong; however, there's a significant difference between stealing pocket change ($20-$40) and strangling a high school girl!!! I don't think these two incidents are even remotely comparable when judging Adnan's character. After all, it's not like he was stealing from the mosque in an attempt to harm it; he was just an ignorant teenager who wanted some quick cash.

    ReplyDelete
  11. 1.) Yes, there are certainly similarities between Capote's and Koenig's investigations. These are inherent due to the style of investigation. They are both heavily based in the reporter-convict relationship and show a more in-depth view of the person.

    2.) If Adnan did kill Hae, I believe that is was premeditated. If the killing were spontaneous then I feel it would have been much more sloppy. There would have been much more evidence, and on the day of the murder it would have taken longer.

    3.) I think we have many conflicting reports on Adnan's character because there weren't many people who really knew him well. As a result, some only knew him for the bad that he did, and others only for the good. This resulted in conflicting reports and I do not feel that any of them paint the whole picture of Adnan.

    4.) The fact that Adnan stole from the mosque means nothing to me. To me it was a quick dumb decision that he made and that he now regrets. It doesn't change who he is as he wasn't thinking about what he was doing, the consequences, or who it may affect at the time. I still believe that Adnan is a good person who just made a stupid decision.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular Posts